Both networks read a planar Gaussian input \(x\sim\mathcal N(0,I_2)\) through two hidden neurons. The teacher network with parameters \((s,\beta)\) and the student network with parameters \((c,\theta)\) have the same shape,
\[f_{s,\beta}(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{1} s_i\,\mathrm{ReLU}(\langle w_i,x\rangle)\;[\,+\langle b,x\rangle\,],\qquad w_i=(\cos\beta_i,\sin\beta_i),\]
with \(\mathrm{ReLU}(z)=\max(z,0)\) and unit directions \(w_i\). For a neuron with general first-layer weight \(\tilde w_i\) and second-layer weight \(\tilde s_i\), the generator is \(g_i=\tilde s_i\,\tilde w_i\), and its mass is the second-layer weight times the norm of the first-layer weight, \(s_i=\tilde s_i\lVert\tilde w_i\rVert\) — positive or negative — with direction \(w_i=\tilde w_i/\lVert\tilde w_i\rVert\), so \(g_i=s_iw_i\). Plain network: the formula without the bracket. Skip network: with the learned linear skip \(\langle b,x\rangle\). The skip makes the sign of a direction irrelevant (see the paper), so the explorer draws a skip-network generator as a segment through the origin.
Scaling symmetry. ReLU is positively homogeneous, \(\mathrm{ReLU}(\lambda z)=\lambda\,\mathrm{ReLU}(z)\) for \(\lambda>0\), so \((\tilde s_i,\tilde w_i)\mapsto(\tilde s_i/\lambda,\lambda\tilde w_i)\) changes neither the generator nor the network function: the loss depends on a neuron only through its generator, and the critical points of the full parametrisation are those of the (mass, direction) parametrisation used here.